This is a little slice of the blogosphere where me, myself and Stevie Chips ramble and rant about video games, television, movies, politics, religion... and things that are likely to start fires. Cuz life is more interesting with a little controversy.
So hop aboard the Crazy Train, strap in, be sure to keep your arms and legs inside at all time... and hang on!
Epic Games - makers of Bulletstorm (which I'm having a lot of fun playing through now), as well as the Unreal and Gears of War games - released one helluva an impressive tech demo showing off the latest version of their Unreal Engine 3. Take a gander at what you can expect to see in games, soon:
Cameron Diaz is a funny actress. I've liked her in virtually everything she's been in. I do not however find her overly attractive. Much the same way I don't find Scarlett Johansson overly attractive. Ya, you read that right. I just don't get her hotness factor. There's something about Diaz's overly large face and wide mouth. To me attractive is Minka Kelly and Jennifer Aniston, but that's a post for another time. Back to Cameron Diaz...
Every interview I've ever seen her in provides further proof that she is one of the most down to earth stars in Hollywood. She seems like one of the guys. And her new movie "Bad Teacher" (due out June 17) might be her funniset movie yet. With a cast that includes Justin "I'm a movie star now" Timberlake, the chubby sales lady from "The Office," and that one guy from "How I Met Your Mother"... well, take a look at the trailer. I laugh my ass off - "LMAO" for those who need text speak to get through the day - every time I watch it.
WARNING: The following video contains material that is waaaaay inappropriate for anyone under the age of 17.
Hey, if vulgar movies starring guys can be hits - do I need to list them all? - why can't a vulgar movie starring a gal be a hit, right?
I received a PR sheet from Sony Pictures Entertainment regarding their new movie, Battle: Los Angeles. Now I'll admit, this type of movie is right in my wheelhouse! The trailer for it looks great, so I can't wait to see it. But this isn't just another fanciful Hollywood blockbuster loaded with CGI effects. There's some modicum of truth behind it...
Unless you're a history buff, or just really interested in Ufology and/or the paranormal (like I am), it's unlikely that you've heard about the real "Battle of Los Angeles" that took place in 1942. That real event is the jumping off point for Sony's new movie.
In the early hours of Saturday, February 25, 1942, one of the strangest events of WWII took place in the skies over Southern California... something that to this day has not been fully explained.
Just after 2:00 A.M. several unidentified objects were reported over Los Angeles. The threat was perceived as the real deal; air raid sirens were sounded and a total blackout was ordered. At 3:16 A.M., the 37th Coast Artillery Brigade started launching 12.8-pound antiaircraft shells at the unidentified objects. Over the next 58 minutes more than 1,400 shells were fired as the objects moved south, from Santa Monica to Long Beach.
From the Sony PR sheet:
Descriptions of the UFOs varied widely. General George C. Marshall, in his initial memo to President Roosevelt regarding the event, wrote that the 'unidentified airplanes... [traveled at speeds ranging from] 'very slow' to as much as 200 mph and from elevations of 9000 to 18,000 feet.' The number of craft reported by observers ranged from 9 to 15 to 25.
At first, officials offered a very vague explanation. According to the Los Angeles Times (February 26, 1942), the secretary of the Navy, Frank Knox, dismissed the event as a "false alarm" due to "jittery nerves," but when this failed to satisfy the press and the public, the Army responded with a definitive answer that the craft and the battle were real, and the next day, Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson confirmed that. Santa Monica's US Representative, Leland Ford, was quoted in the Times on February 27 calling for a Congressional investigation into the incident, but this went nowhere. In the years since, various explanations have been offered – from Japanese planes to German craft launched from secret bases in Mexico to unidentified aircraft to weather balloons to sky lanterns to blimps.
However, it is also alleged that General Marshall reported that the Army had recovered an unidentified aircraft off the coast of California that indicated that the "mystery airplanes are in fact not earthly and according to secret intelligence sources they are in all probability of interplanetary origin.
What actually caused the battle - weather balloons, enemy recon planes, or UFOs - is still up for debate. We do know that the "UFO craze" didn't occur for another few years. Fighter pilots officially started using the term "foo fighter" for unidentified objects in November 1944, and Kenneth Arnold coined the term "flying saucer" in 1947 after seeing something he couldn't identify near Mt. Rainier. Not long after this UFOs become a national phenomena.
